OutSystems vs. Mendix: Third-Party Security Comparison

Compare OutSystems and Mendix in third-party security, exploring their unique approaches to safeguarding components and managing vulnerabilities.

Mar 25, 2025

Looking for a secure low-code platform? Here’s how OutSystems and Mendix stack up when it comes to third-party security:

  • OutSystems focuses on pre-deployment security with automated scans, approval processes, and update management tools to catch vulnerabilities early.

  • Mendix emphasizes runtime security with sandboxed components, real-time monitoring, and a strong App Store review process.

Quick Comparison

Feature

OutSystems

Mendix

Security Approach

Pre-deployment checks

Runtime monitoring

Key Tools

Architecture Dashboard, LifeTime Console

Runtime Security Manager, Security Dashboard

Component Approval

Multi-step approval process

App Store review with manual code checks

Monitoring

Real-time vulnerability scans

SOC with automated threat response

Compliance Support

Automated reports, risk assessments

Built-in compliance tracking

Both platforms offer robust security for third-party components. Choose based on your organization’s needs: OutSystems is ideal for proactive security, while Mendix excels in runtime monitoring.

Appian vs OutSystems | Technical Differences | Which ...

OutSystems Security Tools

OutSystems provides a range of tools and processes designed to secure third-party components in critical applications. Its security framework includes automated scanning, strict approval workflows, and tools for managing updates effectively.

Security Scanning Tools

OutSystems relies on automated security scanning tools to monitor third-party components for vulnerabilities. The platform's Architecture Dashboard conducts real-time security checks, comparing components against vulnerability databases and established security practices. Key features include:

  • Static Code Analysis: Automatically scans third-party code to detect security issues.

  • Dependency Checking: Examines component dependencies for known vulnerabilities.

  • Runtime Security Monitoring: Continuously evaluates component behavior during execution.

These tools form the foundation of the platform's detailed component approval process.

Component Approval Process

OutSystems follows a thorough, multi-step process to ensure third-party components meet security standards. The process includes:

1. Initial Security Assessment

Each component undergoes rigorous testing, including code analysis and vulnerability scans. Only components that meet strict security benchmarks proceed to the next step.

2. Compliance Verification

Components are checked against industry security standards and compliance requirements. This includes ensuring:

  • Alignment with OWASP Top 10 guidelines.

  • Adherence to data privacy regulations.

  • Meeting specific industry-related security needs.

3. Production Deployment Authorization

Components that pass all security evaluations are approved for production use. OutSystems keeps detailed audit logs of all approval decisions and security checks.

Update Management

OutSystems offers tools to handle security updates and patches efficiently. The update management system includes:

  • Automated Version Control: Monitors component versions and flags available security updates.

  • Impact Analysis: Assesses how security patches might affect existing applications.

  • Staged Deployment: Allows for controlled rollout of updates across different environments.

The LifeTime Management Console centralizes update management, giving teams a clear view of component security and simplifying the patching process. This structured approach helps organizations maintain strong security measures while benefiting from third-party integrations in their applications.

Mendix Security Features

Mendix

Mendix employs a layered security system to protect third-party components. At the core is the Runtime Security Manager, which oversees component behavior and enforces security policies. Key features of this architecture include:

  • Component Isolation: Each component operates in a sandboxed environment.

  • Access Control Matrix: Allows precise control over how components interact.

  • Security Tokens: Ensures encrypted authentication for communication between components.

The Runtime Component Validation system keeps an eye out for unauthorized changes or potential breaches in real time. These measures work together to secure third-party integrations within the Mendix platform.

App Store Security

Mendix maintains high security standards for its App Store through its Component Security Gateway, which ensures a rigorous review process:

  • Component Verification: Security assessments are performed using industry-standard tools and expert evaluations.

  • Manual Code Review: Certified security professionals review critical components in detail.

  • Compliance Validation: Ensures components meet established regulations and security standards.

The Component Security Lifecycle Manager enforces version control by tracking and managing updates. This ensures only approved versions of components are available for use.

Security Monitoring

Mendix includes a Security Operations Center (SOC) for monitoring threats and logging activities in real time. Features of this system include:

  • Real-time Analysis: Identifies threats and logs suspicious activities through behavioral analysis.

  • Security Intelligence Dashboard: Consolidates monitoring data into actionable insights.

  • Automated Response: Isolates compromised components immediately upon detecting threats.

The Security Intelligence Dashboard offers teams a centralized view of component security, helping organizations maintain a strong defense while using third-party components. This monitoring system plays a key role in ensuring continuous security across the platform.

Platform Security Comparison

OutSystems and Mendix take different approaches to security. OutSystems focuses on integrating security checks throughout the development process, while Mendix prioritizes monitoring and detecting issues during runtime.

Security Framework Differences

OutSystems addresses security early by conducting pre-deployment checks that identify vulnerabilities before production. Mendix, on the other hand, relies on runtime monitoring to detect and flag unusual activity. These approaches guide the best practices outlined below.

Security Guidelines

For OutSystems:

  • Component Selection: Use components from the official marketplace, which adheres to strict security standards.

  • Regular Security Audits: Conduct periodic audits to verify the integrity of components over time.

  • Update Management: Test automated updates in a controlled environment to ensure security before deployment.

For Mendix:

  • Access Control Configuration: Set granular access controls based on the principle of least privilege.

  • Monitoring Setup: Use security dashboards to track component behavior and configure alerts for unusual activities.

  • Version Control: Implement strict policies to ensure only approved versions of components are deployed.

"Our migration from OutSystems to Mendix was seamless, thanks to Deployd. They saved us time, money, and stress." - Head of IT, European Retailer

Security Standards and Regulations

Both platforms incorporate advanced tools to help organizations meet regulatory requirements and manage vulnerabilities in third-party components effectively. Here's what each platform offers:

OutSystems:

  • Security Dashboard: Monitors vulnerabilities in real-time.

  • Compliance Reports: Automates the creation of security documentation.

  • Risk Assessment System: Assigns security scores to components.

Mendix:

  • Detailed Logs: Tracks activities involving third-party components.

  • Alert System: Allows customizable notifications for potential issues.

  • Built-in Compliance Tracking: Provides regulatory checklists for easier compliance.

These features work alongside each platform's security protocols, enabling organizations to identify and address risks quickly while staying aligned with industry standards. The constant monitoring and documentation capabilities ensure vulnerabilities are managed efficiently.

Conclusion

Key Takeaways

OutSystems and Mendix offer different approaches to securing third-party components, but both platforms deliver strong security measures.

Here’s what stands out:

  • Real-time Monitoring: Both platforms are equipped to monitor security in real time.

  • Compliance Management: Each has tools to help meet regulatory standards.

  • Risk Assessment: Advanced features are available to identify and address vulnerabilities in third-party components.

Choosing the Right Platform

When deciding between these platforms, consider these factors:

  • Business Size and Needs

    Think about your organization’s size, the complexity of your security needs, and how many third-party components you’ll manage. Also, evaluate your team’s ability to handle security monitoring and responses.

  • Implementation Speed
    Low-code platforms can speed up development by as much as 10x. Make sure your security measures can be deployed quickly to address immediate requirements while supporting future growth.

  • Cost vs. Benefits
    Low-code solutions often bring significant advantages, such as:

    • Cutting development costs by 40%

    • Boosting revenue by an average of 58%

    • Quicker rollout and management of security features

Given Gartner’s prediction that 80% of businesses will depend on low-code platforms for critical applications by 2029, it’s crucial to align your security strategy with your long-term goals.

"Our migration from OutSystems to Mendix was seamless, thanks to Deployd. They saved us time, money, and stress." - Head of IT, European Retailer

Related Blog Posts